Volume
2 Issue 5
When In Doubt - Write
Them Up!
Progressive discipline is a management tool aimed at improving
and sustaining the profitability of an organization by ensuring
that its employees follow policies and procedures. Designed
to hold employees accountable, progressive discipline offers
an effective method of delivering documented negative recognition
to employees whose actions and behaviours contradict corporate
policy.
The
psychology behind progressive discipline is rooted in stimulus?response
theories, the heart of the principles of conditioning and
the basis for American psychologist Edward Thorndike's Law
of Effect. Simply put, it states that a response that is followed
by pleasant effects will be repeated and a response that is
followed by unpleasant effects will not. This principle is
clearly demonstrated in child rearing. For example, a parent
who approves of a child's behaviour will deliver a response
in the form of positive recognition that will give the child
a pleasant effect. This is aimed at reinforcing the desired
behaviour and encouraging the child to repeat it. The same
parent who now disapproves of the child's behaviour will provide
a response or negative recognition that will result in an
unpleasant effect for the child. The objective is to discourage
the child from exhibiting the undesired behaviour while reinforcing
the preferred one.
The
Law of Effect holds true in the workplace. When an employee
performs a task, meets expectations, and is positively recognized
for it by management, the employee is motivated to meet future
expectations. When the same employee, for instance, is late
coming back from breaks and is negatively recognized by management,
the expectation is that the employee will immediately respect
the policy and begin to arrive on time.
Too
often however, organizations struggle with disciplinary issues.
First, labour laws and collective agreements have made many
managers apprehensive, even fearful, of using disciplinary
actions as a motivational tool for correction.
Another
reason is a lack of consistency with respect to the application
of disciplinary policies and procedures. In the Leadership
portion of our continuous improvement training series, we
ask students to communicate their understanding of disciplinary
policies in their organization. You would be surprised to
hear the contradictory answers.
Steps
To Effective Corrective Action:
Ensure that all levels of management who are empowered with
the responsibility and authority to use progressive discipline
have a full understanding of the policy; know how to use it,
and when to apply it. This can be accomplished by reviewing
the policy and procedures with the management team and developing
uniformity.
Ensure
that managers and supervisors do not use progressive discipline
as a substitute for effective communication with their employees.
Promote the use of disciplinary action as a last resort, when
candid face?to?face communication has failed. Many employees
don't know what is fully expected of them and, once made aware,
will take corrective steps.
Ensure
that managers and supervisors treat everyone equally as all
policies must apply to all employees. Equality will eliminate
favouritism. Consistency is the key.
|