Volume
2 Issue 3
Management Malpractice
Learn
how downsizing management to increase efficiency only addresses
the symptoms, not the root.
The
backbone of every organization, regardless of its size or
industry, is its managers. Since the mid 80's, many organizations
have eliminated layers upon layers of management in an attempt
to become more efficient and profitable. The result of "trimming
the fat" has only allowed organizations to address the
symptoms, not the root of their problems.
The
real problem is the same old problem that has plagued organizations
for years. It's not having too many managers. It's not poor
planning or a lack of financial resources. The real problem
is called management malpractice.
Managerial
malpractice is defined as the use of managers who are unqualified
and poorly trained. Simply put, organizations that are guilty
of managerial malpractice are ones that hire, retain and support
managers who do not have the interpersonal skills required
to improve organizational performance through their people.
Symptoms of managerial malpractice include;
- selecting
"new" managers based on arbitrary systems such
as seniority, technical competence and bias
- hiring
new managers without regard for their people skills
- retaining
managers who are unskilled at getting results through people
- permitting
managers to behave unprofessionally despite countless complaints
made by their employees.
Every year, organizations spend billions of dollars in desperate
attempts to cure themselves of this ailment by applying every
new management fad that comes along such as empowerment, self-directed
work teams, and Total Quality Management to name a few. In
the end, nothing really changes. So how do you overcome managerial
malpractice and replace it with professional managers? The
answer lies in your hiring practice and the implementation
of quality training and education that is practical, where
skills are transferable and deals with the realities of the
organization.
First,
managers must be technically sound. Selecting managers who
are not technically competent greatly increases the risk of
a loss of credibility and respect from their employees. It
is simply unwise to do so as it sets them up for failure before
they even begin.
Secondly,
managers must be selected for their people skills. They must
understand that people will work best when they are encouraged
to provide input and suggestions for improvement, recognized
for their contribution, given the tools necessary to get the
job done, and treated with respect and dignity. Managers must
demonstrate the ability to develop strong and positive relationships
with their people. For more information on hiring practices,
please refer to the article on the back panel of this issue.
|